Facebook as a potential site for non-standard Breton
Presented on 28 April 2017, atReies an 28 a vis Ebrel 2017, ort Minority languages in new media: Towards revitalisation in Africa and Europe, pednscol Aston University, Birmingham, 27–28 Aprila vis Ebrel.
Abstract
Berrscrif
Studies of the sociolinguistic situation of Breton tend to polarise its speakers into two groups: traditional speakers, who speak Breton as a result of uninterrupted intergenerational transmission and are characterised as elderly, working-class and rurally located; and new speakers, who have in most cases acquired the language through formal education, and are considered younger, more educated, literate in Breton, and more motivated to use it. Breton use on the internet is accordingly associated with the category of new speakers, whose language is usually depicted in academic work as conforming to the standard, non-dialectal form of Breton prescribed by the Breton language office.
This paper examines whether these claims are borne out by the data. If the Breton found online is the preserve of new speakers, and if their language is highly standardised and lacks overt French influence, we should expect to find such a variety on Facebook. Examining “Facebook e brezhoneg”, the most active Breton-language Facebook group, we can test whether this is the case. Focusing on the lexicon, this paper uses a corpus-based methodology to examine a sample of posts, determining whether new lexical items conform to or reject the standard Breton proposed by language planning authorities. Orthographic and discursive features are also examined in order to construct a fuller picture of how standard and non-standard Breton are presented and viewed in this context.
In examining the use of Breton in the non-regulated space provided by a Facebook group, this paper investigates the potential properties of minority languages in such spaces, revealing both what new media can tell us about the under-researched context of informal writing in minority languages, and how it may enable the perpetuation of diverse linguistic variation in the face of potentially restrictive standardisation from above.
References
Scrifow a wruga vy gwul mencyon anodhans
- Broudic, F. (2013). Langue bretonne : Un siècle de mutations. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 223, 7–21.
- German, G. (2007). Language shift, diglossia and dialectal variation in western Brittany: The case of southern Cornouaille. InEn H. L. C. Tristram (ed.pednscrifores), The Celtic languages in contact: Papers from the workshop within the framework of the XIII International Congress of Celtic Studies. Bonn: Universitätsverlag Potsdam, ppff. 146–192.
- Hornsby, M. (2005). Néo-breton and questions of authenticity. Estudios de sociolingüistica 6, 191–218.
- Jones, M. C. (1995). At what price language maintenance? Standardisation in modern Breton. French Studies 49(4), 424–438.
- Timm, L. A. (2001). Transforming Breton: A case study in multiply conflicting language ideologies. Texas Linguistic Forum 44(2), 447–461.